As Jesuit Volunteers, we are placed in communities which
suffer under structural violence. Whether they are broken education systems,
political systems, healthcare systems, social systems, or economic systems
people we work with suffer under systems they have no control over. This is the
type of world we live in and the type of world that Suzanne Collins and Graham
Greene create in “Mockingjay” and in “The Power and the Glory.” These books
resonated with me, not because of how they are written, but because they thrust
a knife into my conscience and twist as hard as they can.
What fascinates me about both these books is the fact that I
see them both as protest books. In "Mockingjay," Ka tniss Everdeen is
reduced to a figurehead. A bulk of the story revolves around her conflict with
being her own agent, but this self-agency is co-opted by both sides of the
conflict. Whether as a sacrifice to remind the districts of their weakness or a
lightning rod that the rebellion can hang its hopes on, she becomes a pawn in a
greater game between political systems. She is no longer a person, but a role
that is inhabited. Katniss and the other tributes are sufferers that we as
readers get to know rather intimately. But, the reality is that Panem is a
world wherein self-agency is reduced to meandering existences of suffering.
Economic inequality reduces people into caricatures of
humanity. From the grotesque Capitol to the faceless Districts, we are forced
to take a pause in where we are today. How does our life of privilege, with our
ability to take a year of our lives to "sacrifice in service," reflect
the grotesqueries of the Capitol? How do our day-to-day interactions with our
partners and clients, how they sometimes become just a torrent of victims
rather than respected individuals, reflect the facelessness of the Districts?
Suzanne Collins slides that knife into our consciousness so that we can see our
own lives for what they are: privileged consumption.
In "The Power and the Glory," we are introduced to
a flawed nameless priest. The bulk of the story revolves around his quest to
survive. But, his final acts revolve around answering the call to serve knowing
full-well that such service would require his life and would only affect one
singular person that did not even embrace his sacrifice. The priest and the
sufferer both die nameless and loveless deaths. Both deaths are witnessed by
crowds of people that go on about their lives. We have to ask ourselves, how
are we all witnesses to suffering in each of our ministries?
The beauty of the story is that compassion grows from a sense
of duty and from a sense of suffering. The priest acts only after he has
suffered persecution and been witness to it. He himself became a victim and a
witness. It brought him closer to a sense of love for all people. How does our
year of solidarity and as witnesses affecting us right now? After this year, where
will our experiences as guide us? Graham Greene shocks us into realizing that
witnesses bear a great responsibility to change the system that has victimized
us all.
It maybe flippant to say what I am saying. In all respects,
we are afforded the luxury to reflect on suffering as a means to entering a
greater conscious morality/spirituality. The suffering that our clients, (I
prefer calling them partners) is all too real. I am not trying to reduce such
suffering to an academic discussion. But, it would be a disservice to not let
their stories shake our worldview. The fictitious characters in “Mockingjay”
and “The Power and the Glory” affected me in a visceral manner. Their suffering
is fictitious. In a world of self-numbing media consumption, of caricatured
human experiences, of narcissistic self-advertisement, we have the ability to
bear the stories of this year and learn as witnesses to suffering. What we
learn and how we change is entirely up to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment